[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d73d9abca9d4b0a8c630235d9cfb3ccc5148e298.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 23:05:57 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "bsingharora@...il.com" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Syromiatnikov, Eugene" <esyr@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"fweimer@...hat.com" <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"nadav.amit@...il.com" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"dethoma@...rosoft.com" <dethoma@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mike.kravetz@...cle.com" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com" <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"gorcunov@...il.com" <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [OPTIONAL/RFC v2 36/39] x86/fpu: Add helper for initing features
On Mon, 2022-10-03 at 12:07 -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Given the xsave area and a state inside, this function
> > + * initializes an xfeature in the buffer.
>
> But, this function sets XSTATE_BV bits in the buffer. That does not
> *initialize* the state, right?
No, it doesn't actually write out the init state to the buffer.
>
> > + *
> > + * get_xsave_addr() will return NULL if the feature bit is
> > + * not present in the header. This function will make it so
> > + * the xfeature buffer address is ready to be retrieved by
> > + * get_xsave_addr().
>
> Looks like this is used in the next patch to help ptracer().
>
> We have the state copy function -- copy_uabi_to_xstate() that
> retrieves
> the address using __raw_xsave_addr() instead of get_xsave_addr(),
> copies
> the state, and then updates XSTATE_BV.
>
> __raw_xsave_addr() also ensures whether the state is in the
> compacted
> format or not. I think you can use it.
>
> Also, I'm curious about the reason why you want to update XSTATE_BV
> first with this new helper.
>
> Overall, I'm not sure these new helpers are necessary.
Thomas had experimented with this optimization where init state
features weren't saved:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220404103741.809025935@linutronix.de/
It made me think non-fpu code should not assume things about the state
of the buffer, as FPU code might have to move things when initing them.
So the operation is worth centralizing in a helper. I think you are
right, today it is not doing much and could be open coded. I guess the
question is, should it be open coded or centralized? I'm fine either
way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists