[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMGffEkPnrjjzZMca5YQ8NT-xnBFPfFoBxs63jY431FtpFvF3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:51:35 +0200
From: Jinpu Wang <jinpu.wang@...os.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: damien.lemoal@....com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, hare@...e.de,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com, ipylypiv@...gle.com, changyuanl@...gle.com,
hch@....de, yanaijie@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] scsi: pm8001: Use sas_task_find_rq() for tagging
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:05 PM John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 30/09/2022 11:20, John Garry wrote:
> > BTW, I do notice that we still have this global lock in delivery path
> > which should be removed at some stage:
> > > int mvs_queue_command(struct sas_task *task, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> > {
> > ...
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&mvi->lock, flags);
> > rc = mvs_task_prep(task, mvi, is_tmf, tmf, &pass);
> > ...
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mvi->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
>
> oops... that's mvsas. But pm8001 does still use a big lock (which we
> should get rid off):
Yes, would be great to get rid of the per ha lock.
>
> int pm8001_queue_command(struct sas_task *task, gfp_t gfp_flags)
> {
> ...
> pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO, "pm8001_task_exec device\n");
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&pm8001_ha->lock, flags);
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> > That really will affect performance...
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists