linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] device property: Keep dev_fwnode() and dev_fwnode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YzvuFBo5Vd6S4QoO@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:25:56 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] device property: Keep dev_fwnode() and
 dev_fwnode_const() separate

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:24:13AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:14:14AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:55:21AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 08:08:58PM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 06:17:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

...

> > > > #define kobj_to_dev(kobj)						\
> > > > 	(_Generic((kobj),						\
> > > > 		  const struct kobject *: __kobj_to_dev_const,		\
> > > > 		  struct kobject *: __kobj_to_dev)(kobj))
> > > 
> > > Ah, doh!  I had the (kobj) part in the wrong place, thanks for that
> > > fix...
> > > 
> > > Ok, this looks better, let me see how well the build breaks with some of
> > > these changes
> > 
> > I believe I can rewrite my patch like this and then it will be much nicer since
> > we may constify all the rest without calling __dev_fwnode_const() directly.
> > 
> > Are you agree?
> 
> Yes, I think this is a much better option, try it and see.  Below is the
> patch I'm running through my build systems at the moment, feel free to
> copy the style for your change as well.

Yep, thanks for sharing!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko