[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzvwdSiQeLghucVW@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:36:05 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V . Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
joao.moreira@...el.com, John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
kcc@...gle.com, eranian@...gle.com, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
dethoma@...rosoft.com, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 33/39] x86/cpufeatures: Limit shadow stack to Intel
CPUs
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 05:09:04PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/3/22 16:57, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:29:30PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> >> Shadow stack is supported on newer AMD processors, but the kernel
> >> implementation has not been tested on them. Prevent basic issues from
> >> showing up for normal users by disabling shadow stack on all CPUs except
> >> Intel until it has been tested. At which point the limitation should be
> >> removed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> > So running the selftests on an AMD system is sufficient to drop this
> > patch?
>
> Yes, that's enough.
>
> I _thought_ the AMD folks provided some tested-by's at some point in the
> past. But, maybe I'm confusing this for one of the other shared
> features. Either way, I'm sure no tested-by's were dropped on purpose.
>
> I'm sure Rick is eager to trim down his series and this would be a great
> patch to drop. Does anyone want to make that easy for Rick?
FWIW, I've run CRIU test suite with the previous version of this set on an
AMD machine.
> <hint> <hint>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists