linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 23/30] pinctrl: starfive: Rename "pinctrl-starfive" to "pinctrl-starfive-jh7100"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yzv7Dmc0/IbAystL@wendy>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:21:18 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Hal Feng <hal.feng@...ux.starfivetech.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 23/30] pinctrl: starfive: Rename "pinctrl-starfive" to
 "pinctrl-starfive-jh7100"

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:13:37AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:59 AM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:48:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 11:28 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:14:04 +0800, Hal Feng wrote:
> > > > > From: Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add the SoC name to make it more clear. Also the next generation StarFive
> > > > > SoCs will use "pinctrl-starfive" as the core of StarFive pinctrl driver.
> > > > > No functional change.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@...rfivetech.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...ux.starfivetech.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../bindings/pinctrl/starfive,jh7100-pinctrl.yaml           | 2 +-
> > > > >  arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7100-beaglev-starlight.dts   | 2 +-
> > > > >  drivers/pinctrl/starfive/Kconfig                            | 2 +-
> > > > >  drivers/pinctrl/starfive/Makefile                           | 2 +-
> > > > >  .../{pinctrl-starfive.c => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.c}       | 2 +-
> > > > >  .../{pinctrl-starfive.h => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.h}       | 6 +++---
> > > > >  6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > >  rename drivers/pinctrl/starfive/{pinctrl-starfive.c => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.c} (99%)
> > > > >  rename include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/{pinctrl-starfive.h => pinctrl-starfive-jh7100.h} (98%)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > > >
> > > > Would be good to pull this out separately and apply for 6.1. It's kind
> > > > of messy with cross tree dependencies.
> > >
> > > OK I applied this for V6.1.
> >
> > Will this need to be done immutably so it can be pulled into the riscv
> > tree in case this gets applied as a late change for 6.1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/c5169131-486e-9808-ba48-b7abe1be6a99@collabora.com/
> 
> Always one finger on the fast-forward button have we? ;)

Dunno what you mean by that mate, sorry!

I just saw the mail wanted to have the decency to reply to that fellow
& tell him to rebase after rc1 to avoid a conflict.

> Rob's point was that I should apply this for v6.1 so that exactly
> that kind of cross-dependencies and immutable branches could
> be avoided for the v6.2 development cycle.
> 
> The merge window is already open, it's a bit late for completely
> new stuff I think.

History suggests otherwise, but I'd be lying if I said I disagreed.