[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <122af5c891fcc65fb6179ec53a89374daa4600aa.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 12:21:20 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 net 3/5] tcp/udp: Call inet6_destroy_sock() in
IPv6 sk->sk_destruct().
Hello,
On Mon, 2022-10-03 at 08:44 -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
[...]
> @@ -1723,7 +1736,7 @@ struct proto udpv6_prot = {
> .connect = ip6_datagram_connect,
> .disconnect = udp_disconnect,
> .ioctl = udp_ioctl,
> - .init = udp_init_sock,
> + .init = udpv6_init_sock,
> .destroy = udpv6_destroy_sock,
> .setsockopt = udpv6_setsockopt,
> .getsockopt = udpv6_getsockopt,
It looks like even UDPv6 lite can be ADDRFORMed to ipv4, so I guess we
need a similar chunk for udplitev6_prot? With that we can unexport
udp_init_sock, I guess.
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists