lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 13:12:43 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sagit: add initial device tree
 for sagit

On 03/10/2022 21:43, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> New device support - Xiaomi Mi6 phone
> 
> What works:
> - storage
> - usb
> - power regulators
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes for v5:
> - use pm8005_regulators label

It's the third patch sent right after another. No. You need to wait one
day. More over, all previous changelog is gone, so I really have no clue
what is happening here.

Send v6 with proper changelogs and all comments applied or keep
discussing. You keep ignoring comments, then resending something three
times. It's not the way to work with reviewers and make their life easier.

> +
> +	wcd_int_n: wcd-int-n {
> +		pins = "gpio54";
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		bias-pull-down;
> +		drive-strength = <2>;
> +		input-enable;
> +	};
> +
> +	wsa_leftspk_pwr_n: wsa-leftspk-pwr-n {
> +		pins = "gpio65";
> +		function = "gpio";

Still wrong.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ