linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Remove burst mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28a468ec-615a-9a9a-109e-cae21aef317e@denx.de>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:15:43 +0200
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     estl@....net, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc:     Eberhard Stoll <eberhard.stoll@...tron.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Remove burst mode

On 10/4/22 13:57, estl@....net wrote:
> From: Eberhard Stoll <eberhard.stoll@...tron.de>
> 
> Remove LVDS panel overclocking for some configurations by disabling
> burst mode for this chip
> 
> With burst mode enabled, some DSI controllers increase their DSI lane
> clock beyond the clock which is needed to transfer all pixel data.
> 
> But this driver operates with a pixel clock derived from the DSI lane
> clock by a fixed prescaler. So, every increase of the DSI clock also
> increases the LVDS pixel clock. In this case, the LVDS pixel clock is
> overclocked.
> 
> This is the case e.g. for synopsys stm DSI bridge
> (drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c). With burst mode the DSI clock is
> increased by 20% and therefore also for the LVDS panel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eberhard Stoll <eberhard.stoll@...tron.de>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> index c901c0e1a3b0..ffc39208536e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int sn65dsi83_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> 
>   	dsi->lanes = ctx->dsi_lanes;
>   	dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
> -	dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST;
> +	dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO;
> 
>   	ret = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
>   	if (ret < 0) {

The burst mode is the most efficient mode, so please keep it. This patch 
is the wrong approach.

The problem with DSI HS clock is known and long standing, I tried to 
solve it twice, but neither solution made it in. It is probably a good 
idea to read through the suggestions and try to follow the latest one by 
negotiating the link clock via bridge state:

https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220801131113.182487-1-marex@denx.de/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220219002844.362157-1-marex@denx.de/