[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW1yp76X6xMFSXnpRNXPBVVLuyqm=UCOZ0uQem0_50poQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:32:26 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
workflows@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
ksummit@...ts.linux.dev,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: Planned changes for bugzilla.kernel.org to reduce the "Bugzilla blues"
Hi Artem,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 2:16 PM Artem S. Tashkinov <aros@....com> wrote:
> On 10/3/22 14:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 09:40:43 +0000
> > "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com> wrote:
> >> For instance, I've CC'ed Linus Torvalds _privately_ from Bugzilla twice
> >> and he _chimed_ in and _helped_ resolve the bugs.
> >
> > You didn't Cc Linus _privately_, because you Cc'd him from Bugzilla. I'm
> > guessing that means it's a public conversation. Which is similar to Cc'ing
> > a maintainer and a public mailing list.
>
> I _did_ CC him privately by adding his _personal_ e-mail. I'm astonished
> not only you don't believe me you turn my words inside out.
I think there is a misunderstanding of the meaning of "CC privately".
To me it means no public data disclosing entity (be it a public mailing
list, or a public bug tracker) was CCed as well.
To you, it seems to mean you used his personal email address instead
of a mailing list address.
> Wow, so pretty much the vast majority of people here advocate for
> deprecating Bugzilla and asking non-IT people to use something which is
> essentially a ... SPAM list?
>
> Woah.
>
> I've given almost a dozen reasons why mailing lists simply don't work as
> a bug tracker in absolute most cases.
And people disagree. No amount of "Woah" will change that, only
facts and figures can do.
> BTW, this discussion is a perfect f-ing example of that. What could have
> been easily read in a tracker needs to be repeated over and over and
> over again because you didn't bother to read previous messages 'cause
> you were busy, not paying attention, simply forgot and you don't want to
> scroll days of messages in your inbox.
>
> God, this is so ugly it's cringe worthy.
>
> Most people here who advocate for killing off Bugzilla:
>
> 1) Have _never_ used it
> 2) Have troubles even following _this_ conversation
>
> That' ridiculous.
Thanks for your insults.
This is not the way to convince people.
P.S. I did read all of it, I may stop doing so soon...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists