lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:17:03 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: panel: use
 spi-peripheral-props.yaml

Hi Krzysztof,

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 03:10:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/10/2022 15:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:09:07PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> For devices connectable by SPI bus (e.g. already using
> >> "spi-max-frequency" property), reference the "spi-peripheral-props.yaml"
> >> schema to allow using all SPI device properties, even these which device
> >> bindings author did not tried yet.
> > 
> > Isn't this done implicitly by spi-controller.yaml ? SPI devices that are
> > children of an SPI controller should match the patternProperties
> > "^.*@[0-9a-f]+$" in that file, which has a $ref: spi-peripheral-props.yaml.
> > Is there something I'm missing ?
> 
> You are correct about one side of this - SPI controller bindings.
> However these schemas here have clear: additional/unevaluatedProperties:
> false, thus when they find DTS like:
> panel@xxx {
>   compatible = "one of these spi panels";
>   ...
>   spi-cs-high;
>   spi-rx-delay-us = <50>;
>   ... and some more from specific controllers
> }
> 
> you will get errors, because the panel schema does not allow them.
> 
> The bindings were done (some time ago) in such way, that they require
> that both SPI controller and SPI device reference spi-props.

You're absolutely right that additionalProperties needs to be replaced
by unevaluatedProperties. Can the additions of $ref be dropped, or is
that needed too ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ