[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6fe60739-d6fc-17d1-ddce-0be43bb5c234@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:55:49 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] libperf: Propagate maps only if necessary
On 4/10/22 15:14, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:46:44PM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> The current code propagate evsel's cpu map settings to evlist when it's
>> added to an evlist. But the evlist->all_cpus and each evsel's cpus will
>> be updated in perf_evlist__set_maps() later. No need to do it before
>> evlist's cpus are set actually.
>>
>> In fact it discards this intermediate all_cpus maps at the beginning
>> of perf_evlist__set_maps(). Let's not do this. It's only needed when
>> an evsel is added after the evlist cpu/thread maps are set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> tools/lib/perf/evlist.c | 11 ++++-------
>> tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evlist.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c b/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c
>> index 187129652ab6..8ce92070086c 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evlist.c
>> @@ -67,9 +67,7 @@ static void perf_evlist__propagate_maps(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
>> {
>> struct perf_evsel *evsel;
>>
>> - /* Recomputing all_cpus, so start with a blank slate. */
>> - perf_cpu_map__put(evlist->all_cpus);
>> - evlist->all_cpus = NULL;
>> + evlist->needs_map_propagation = true;
>>
>> perf_evlist__for_each_evsel(evlist, evsel)
>> __perf_evlist__propagate_maps(evlist, evsel);
>> @@ -81,7 +79,9 @@ void perf_evlist__add(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>> evsel->idx = evlist->nr_entries;
>> list_add_tail(&evsel->node, &evlist->entries);
>> evlist->nr_entries += 1;
>> - __perf_evlist__propagate_maps(evlist, evsel);
>> +
>> + if (evlist->needs_map_propagation)
>> + __perf_evlist__propagate_maps(evlist, evsel);
>> }
>>
>> void perf_evlist__remove(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>> @@ -177,9 +177,6 @@ void perf_evlist__set_maps(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>> evlist->threads = perf_thread_map__get(threads);
>> }
>>
>> - if (!evlist->all_cpus && cpus)
>> - evlist->all_cpus = perf_cpu_map__get(cpus);
>> -
>> perf_evlist__propagate_maps(evlist);
>
> IIRC Adrian suggested this extra thing, but he provided the Reviewed-by
> for the previous patch, where this isn't present, Adrian, can you please
> confirm this and if this is the case provide your Reviewed-by for this
> new version?
Oops sorry, I meant this one:
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evlist.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evlist.h
>> index 6f89aec3e608..850f07070036 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evlist.h
>> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/internal/evlist.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct perf_evlist {
>> int nr_entries;
>> int nr_groups;
>> bool has_user_cpus;
>> + bool needs_map_propagation;
>> /**
>> * The cpus passed from the command line or all online CPUs by
>> * default.
>> --
>> 2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists