linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5baaba9c-b07d-4d28-9416-217ebed14eb4@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 09:16:31 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>
Cc:     "bsingharora@...il.com" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Syromiatnikov, Eugene" <esyr@...hat.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "fweimer@...hat.com" <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "nadav.amit@...il.com" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "dethoma@...rosoft.com" <dethoma@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>, "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>,
        "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mike.kravetz@...cle.com" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        "jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com" <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        "john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
        "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "gorcunov@...il.com" <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description

On 10/3/22 23:56, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 20:41 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> On 9/30/22 20:33, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>>>   CET introduces Shadow Stack and Indirect Branch Tracking.
>>>> Shadow stack is
>>>>   a secondary stack allocated from memory and cannot be directly
>>>> modified by
>>>> -applications. When executing a CALL instruction, the processor
>>>> pushes the
>>>> +applications. When executing a ``CALL`` instruction, the
>>>> processor pushes the
>>>
>>> Just to be clear, not everybody is fond of sprinkling lots of
>>> ``literal
>>> text`` throughout the documentation in this way.  Heavy use of it
>>> will
>>> certainly clutter the plain-text file and can be a net negative
>>> overall.
>>>
>>
>> Actually there is a trade-off between semantic correctness and plain-
>> text
>> clarity. With regards to inline code samples (like identifiers), I
>> fall
>> into the former camp. But when I'm reviewing patches for which the
>> surrounding documentation go latter camp (leave code samples alone
>> without
>> markup), I can adapt to that style as long as it causes no warnings
>> whatsover.
> 
> Thanks. Unless anyone has any objections, I think I'll take all these
> changes, except for the literal-izing of the instructions. They are not
> really being used as code samples in this case.
> 
> Bagas, can you reply with your sign-off and I'll just apply it?

OK, here goes...

Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara