linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add misc support for QDU1000/QRU1000 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2e385bec-6eff-a410-d977-c3f99c69ab42@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:27:46 -0500
From:   Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC:     Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add misc support for QDU1000/QRU1000 SoCs


On 10/1/2022 4:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/10/2022 05:06, Melody Olvera wrote:
>> This series firmware, SoC, rpmpd, tz-log, and mmc bindings as well as
>> pmic, rpmpd, and socinfo support for QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs.
>>
>> This patchset is based off of [1] and [2] YAML conversion patches.
> All of your patchsets were sent to wrong Bjorn's address. This means
> either you based on mainline (which is reasonable but for some reason
> address was not fixed in mainline...) or on some older linux-next.
>
> I propose to rebase on recent linux-next, so you will get proper Bjorn's
> email.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Thanks Krzysztof. Yeah I figured that out; will add his most recent email in the next patchset. I was working on the tip of the linux-next stable branch, but does it make more sense to rebase on the master branch of linux-next prior to submitting?

Thanks,

Melody