[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2c5d8cd-aee1-d02f-33b4-d424a6db9c55@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 05:37:58 +0000
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
CC: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/21] block: add and use init tagset helper
On 10/4/22 22:11, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 10/5/22 12:22, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> Add and use the helper to initialize the common fields of the tag_set
>> such as blk_mq_ops, number of h/w queues, queue depth, command size,
>> numa_node, timeout, BLK_MQ_F_XXX flags, driver data. This initialization
>> is spread all over the block drivers. This avoids the code repetation of
>> the inialization code of the tag set in current block drivers and any
>
> s/inialization/initialization
> s/repetation/repetition
>
>> future ones.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-mq.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 10 +++-------
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 8070b6c10e8d..e3a8dd81bbe2 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -4341,6 +4341,26 @@ static int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>> return blk_mq_realloc_tag_set_tags(set, 0, new_nr_hw_queues);
>> }
>>
>> +void blk_mq_init_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>> + const struct blk_mq_ops *ops, unsigned int nr_hw_queues,
>> + unsigned int queue_depth, unsigned int cmd_size, int numa_node,
>> + unsigned int timeout, unsigned int flags, void *driver_data)
>
> That is an awful lot of arguments... I would be tempted to say pack all
> these into a struct but then that would kind of negate this patchset goal.
yes..
> Using a function with that many arguments will be error prone, and hard to
> review... Not a fan.
>
Recent addition to the block layer code blk_rq_map_user_io() has 9
arguments:-
int blk_rq_map_user_io(struct request *req, struct rq_map_data
*map_data, void __user *ubuf, unsigned long buf_len,
gfp_t gfp_mask, bool vec, int iov_count, bool check_iter_count,
int rw)
above function also has 9 arguments not more than what is present
in the block tree. I can trim down the argument list probably by
removing the numa_node as it is set to NUMA_NO_NODE for most of the
drivers.
-ck
Powered by blists - more mailing lists