linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] soc: renesas: Add L2 cache management for RZ/Five SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uxuMPr+Jwizn13FjGYtnStG7Nw_MCRkdSz6y9HoEeA=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2022 11:14:22 +0100
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        guoren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        "Conor.Dooley" <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] soc: renesas: Add L2 cache management for
 RZ/Five SoC

Hi Arnd,

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 10:58 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, at 7:42 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 11:32:22PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h    |   8 +
> >>  arch/riscv/include/asm/errata_list.h   |   2 +
> >>  arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h           |   1 +
> >>  arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c        |  20 ++
> >
> > Stupid question maybe, but I assume you mixed the driver addition and
> > the changes to arch/riscv for the sake of easily creating the RFC?
> >
> >>  drivers/soc/renesas/Makefile           |   4 +
> >>  drivers/soc/renesas/rzf/Makefile       |   3 +
> >>  drivers/soc/renesas/rzf/ax45mp_cache.c | 365 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/soc/renesas/rzf/rzf_sbi.h      |  27 ++
>
> My feeling is that L2 cache behavior should live in arch/riscv
> rather than drivers/soc/, since this is not specific to a SoC
> family but rather the CPU core. I would also expect that the
> actual implementation and DT binding can be shared with
> non-renesas SoCs using the same CPU core.
>
Totally agree it is related to the CPU core and not the SoC. During
the BoF session it was agreed that unratified extensions code shouldnt
go under the arch/riscv. Since the code has vendor specific SBI calls
RISC-V maintainers asked to move it SoC specific so that maintenance
of the code falls under SoC vendors.

Cheers,
Prabhakar