linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 41/51] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221005113212.190566979@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  5 Oct 2022 13:32:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 41/51] xfs: fix s_maxbytes computation on 32-bit kernels

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>

commit 932befe39ddea29cf47f4f1dc080d3dba668f0ca upstream.

I observed a hang in generic/308 while running fstests on a i686 kernel.
The hang occurred when trying to purge the pagecache on a large sparse
file that had a page created past MAX_LFS_FILESIZE, which caused an
integer overflow in the pagecache xarray and resulted in an infinite
loop.

I then noticed that Linus changed the definition of MAX_LFS_FILESIZE in
commit 0cc3b0ec23ce ("Clarify (and fix) MAX_LFS_FILESIZE macros") so
that it is now one page short of the maximum page index on 32-bit
kernels.  Because the XFS function to compute max offset open-codes the
2005-era MAX_LFS_FILESIZE computation and neither the vfs nor mm perform
any sanity checking of s_maxbytes, the code in generic/308 can create a
page above the pagecache's limit and kaboom.

Fix all this by setting s_maxbytes to MAX_LFS_FILESIZE directly and
aborting the mount with a warning if our assumptions ever break.  I have
no answer for why this seems to have been broken for years and nobody
noticed.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -512,32 +512,6 @@ xfs_showargs(
 		seq_puts(m, ",noquota");
 }
 
-static uint64_t
-xfs_max_file_offset(
-	unsigned int		blockshift)
-{
-	unsigned int		pagefactor = 1;
-	unsigned int		bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
-
-	/* Figure out maximum filesize, on Linux this can depend on
-	 * the filesystem blocksize (on 32 bit platforms).
-	 * __block_write_begin does this in an [unsigned] long long...
-	 *      page->index << (PAGE_SHIFT - bbits)
-	 * So, for page sized blocks (4K on 32 bit platforms),
-	 * this wraps at around 8Tb (hence MAX_LFS_FILESIZE which is
-	 *      (((u64)PAGE_SIZE << (BITS_PER_LONG-1))-1)
-	 * but for smaller blocksizes it is less (bbits = log2 bsize).
-	 */
-
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
-	ASSERT(sizeof(sector_t) == 8);
-	pagefactor = PAGE_SIZE;
-	bitshift = BITS_PER_LONG;
-#endif
-
-	return (((uint64_t)pagefactor) << bitshift) - 1;
-}
-
 /*
  * Set parameters for inode allocation heuristics, taking into account
  * filesystem size and inode32/inode64 mount options; i.e. specifically
@@ -1650,6 +1624,26 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
 	if (error)
 		goto out_free_sb;
 
+	/*
+	 * XFS block mappings use 54 bits to store the logical block offset.
+	 * This should suffice to handle the maximum file size that the VFS
+	 * supports (currently 2^63 bytes on 64-bit and ULONG_MAX << PAGE_SHIFT
+	 * bytes on 32-bit), but as XFS and VFS have gotten the s_maxbytes
+	 * calculation wrong on 32-bit kernels in the past, we'll add a WARN_ON
+	 * to check this assertion.
+	 *
+	 * Avoid integer overflow by comparing the maximum bmbt offset to the
+	 * maximum pagecache offset in units of fs blocks.
+	 */
+	if (XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE) > XFS_MAX_FILEOFF) {
+		xfs_warn(mp,
+"MAX_LFS_FILESIZE block offset (%llu) exceeds extent map maximum (%llu)!",
+			 XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE),
+			 XFS_MAX_FILEOFF);
+		error = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_free_sb;
+	}
+
 	error = xfs_filestream_mount(mp);
 	if (error)
 		goto out_free_sb;
@@ -1661,7 +1655,7 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
 	sb->s_magic = XFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
 	sb->s_blocksize = mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
 	sb->s_blocksize_bits = ffs(sb->s_blocksize) - 1;
-	sb->s_maxbytes = xfs_max_file_offset(sb->s_blocksize_bits);
+	sb->s_maxbytes = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
 	sb->s_max_links = XFS_MAXLINK;
 	sb->s_time_gran = 1;
 	sb->s_time_min = S32_MIN;