Message-ID: <CAJM55Z8xxrKqaN64KAP9miTis4wFbL2S9uhV5h-SOiYjbYng+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2022 15:14:44 +0200
From:   Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hal Feng <hal.feng@...ux.starfivetech.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 15/30] clk: starfive: Use regmap APIs to operate registers

On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 23:50, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Hal Feng (2022-09-29 10:56:02)
> > Clock registers address region is shared with reset controller
> > on the new StarFive JH7110 SoC. Change to use regmap framework
> > to allow base address sharing and preparation for JH7110 clock
> > support.
>
> Do the reset and clk parts share actual registers, where we would need
> to lock between rmw? Or is regmap just nice to have because it wraps up
> the register APIs with some extra features?

No, the registers aren't shared, but on the JH7100 clock and reset had
separate ranges, but on the JH7110 there is just one memory range for
each "CRG", clock and reset generator I presume, and the reset
registers are placed after the clock registers in the same range.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@...ux.starfivetech.com>
> > ---
> [...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c
> > index 014e36f17595..410aa6e06842 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7100.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >
> > @@ -295,11 +296,13 @@ static int __init clk_starfive_jh7100_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >         if (!priv)
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -       spin_lock_init(&priv->rmw_lock);
> >         priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > -       priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > -       if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> > -               return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> > +       priv->regmap = device_node_to_regmap(priv->dev->of_node);
>
> This is sad. Why do we need to make a syscon? Can we instead use the
> auxiliary bus to make a reset device that either gets a regmap made here
> in this driver or uses a void __iomem * mapped with ioremap
> (priv->base)?

In my original code the clock driver just registers the resets too
similar to other combined clock and reset drivers. I wonder what you
think about that approach:
https://github.com/esmil/linux/commit/36f15e1b827b02d7f493dc5fce31060b21976e68
and
https://github.com/esmil/linux/commit/4ccafadb72968480aa3dd28c227fcccae411c13b#diff-ffec81f902f810cb210012c25e8d88217ea5b4021419a4206d1fd4dd19edfce8R471

> > +       if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap)) {
> > +               dev_err(priv->dev, "failed to get regmap (error %ld)\n",
> > +                       PTR_ERR(priv->regmap));
> > +               return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists