[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1d59744f54743a4a8131787580d181a@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 13:32:53 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Kees Cook' <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: 'Dave Hansen' <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V . Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"joao.moreira@...el.com" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
"kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com" <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"dethoma@...rosoft.com" <dethoma@...rosoft.com>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 24/39] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack
support
From: Kees Cook
> Sent: 04 October 2022 20:32
...
> Oh, yes! I do this all the time with FORTIFY shenanigans. Right, so,
> instead of a macro, the "cannot be un-inlined" could be enforced with
> this (untested):
>
> static __always_inline void set_clr_bits_msrl(u32 msr, u64 set, u64 clear)
> {
> u64 val, new_val;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(msr) ||
> !__builtin_constant_p(set) ||
> !__builtin_constant_p(clear));
You can reduce the amount of text the brain has to parse
by using:
BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(msr + set + clear));
Just requires the brain to do a quick 'oh yes'...
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists