[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xhsmh7d1e2qp2.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 17:14:17 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] workqueue: Unbind workers before sending them to
exit()
On 05/10/22 22:50, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On 05 Oct 2022 12:13:17 +0100 Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
>
> Bound kworkers can be destroyed by the idle timer on a housekeeping CPU.
>
> Diff is only for thoughts.
>
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1985,6 +1985,7 @@ fail:
> static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
> {
> struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&pool->lock);
>
> @@ -1999,6 +2000,12 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker
>
> list_del_init(&worker->entry);
> worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE;
> +
> + if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) && pool->cpu != cpu) {
> + /* send worker to die on a housekeeping cpu */
> + cpumask_clear(&worker->task->cpus_mask);
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &worker->task->cpus_mask);
> + }
> wake_up_process(worker->task);
> }
>
The proper interface to play with that cpumask is set_cpus_allowed_ptr(),
which requires a sleepable context, hence the whole series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists