linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2022 13:54:52 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the tip tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 17:49:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   lib/Kconfig.debug
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   724c299c6a0e ("perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting")
> 
> from the tip tree and commit:
> 
>   bb26bbd0a067 ("fortify: Add KUnit test for FORTIFY_SOURCE internals")
> 
> from the kspp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc lib/Kconfig.debug
> index e40550a5bdd3,1f267c0ddffd..000000000000
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@@ -2533,16 -2542,15 +2545,25 @@@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TES
>   	  CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
>   	  or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
>   
>  +config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST
>  +	bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
>  +	depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
>  +	depends on KUNIT=y
>  +	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
>  +	help
>  +	  Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting.
>  +
>  +	  If unsure, say N.
>  +
> + config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST
> + 	tristate "Test fortified str*() and mem*() function internals at runtime" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + 	depends on KUNIT && FORTIFY_SOURCE
> + 	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> + 	help
> + 	  Builds unit tests for checking internals of FORTIFY_SOURCE as used
> + 	  by the str*() and mem*() family of functions. For testing runtime
> + 	  traps of FORTIFY_SOURCE, see LKDTM's "FORTIFY_*" tests.
> + 
>   config TEST_UDELAY
>   	tristate "udelay test driver"
>   	help

This is now a conflict between the tip tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped