[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yz3VItDOw6mYwxak@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 21:04:02 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Arminder Singh <arminders208@...look.com>
Cc: alyssa@...enzweig.io, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, chzigotzky@...osoft.de,
darren@...vens-zone.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, marcan@...can.st,
mpe@...erman.id.au, paulus@...ba.org, sven@...npeter.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c-pasemi: PASemi I2C controller IRQ enablement
> Does fixing the alignment issues and the commit description justify a v3
> of the patch or should the minor fixes go out as a "resend"? Just not sure
> in this particular case as the fixes seem to be very minor ones.
Yes, please send a v3. Since you are only fixing whitespace issues, you
can add the Tested-by tags given here for v3 already.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists