[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yz3pFPuJrWEIHCWz@x1n>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:29:08 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/7] mm/ksm: simplify break_ksm() to not rely on
VM_FAULT_WRITE
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 04:19:26PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I don't think that we particularly care about that performance drop when
> unmerging. If it ever turns out to be an actual performance issue, we can
> think about a better alternative for FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE -- let's just keep
> it simple for now.
It'll be nice to hear from real ksm users for sure. But to me this makes
sense, and the patch itself looks good to me, I think that also means:
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists