[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31a4de54-9fbe-8487-903d-28528a1b42d3@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:47:46 -0700
From: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Murali Nalajala <quic_mnalajal@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
"Srivatsa Vaddagiri" <quic_svaddagi@...cinc.com>,
Carl van Schaik <quic_cvanscha@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Will Deacon" <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/14] gunyah: rsc_mgr: Add auxiliary devices for
console
On 10/4/2022 11:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 04:49:27PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
>> On 9/30/2022 5:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:56:32PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
>>>> Gunyah resource manager exposes a concrete functionalities which
>>>> complicate a single resource manager driver.
>>>
>>> I am sorry, but I do not understand this sentance. What is so
>>> complicated about individual devices being created? Where are they
>>> created? What bus?
>>
>> There's no complexity here with using individual devices, that's why I
>> wanted to create secondary (auxiliary devices).
>>
>> IOW -- "I have a platform device that does a lot of different things. Split
>> up the different functionalities of that device into sub devices using the
>> auxiliary bus."
>
> Why not just have multiple platform devices? You control them, don't
> make it more complex than it should be.
>
> And why are these platform devices at all?
>
> As you say:
>
>> A key requirement for utilizing the auxiliary bus is that there is no
>> dependency on a physical bus, device, register accesses or regmap support.
>> These individual devices split from the core cannot live on the platform bus
>> as they are not physical devices that are controlled by DT/ACPI.
>
> These are not in the DT. So just make your own bus for them instead of
> using a platform device. Don't abuse a platform device please.
>
I'll avoid creating platform devices. Are there any concerns with
creating auxiliary device under the platform device? There will only be
2 auxiliary devices under this Resource Manager device: one for console,
and one for a VM loader.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists