linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/39] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d4ff84214629fe9cfe32cb05ec63ee8d390f7ea.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Oct 2022 23:01:39 +0000
From:   "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To:     "bsingharora@...il.com" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Syromiatnikov, Eugene" <esyr@...hat.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "fweimer@...hat.com" <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "nadav.amit@...il.com" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "dethoma@...rosoft.com" <dethoma@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        "hjl.tools@...il.com" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mike.kravetz@...cle.com" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com" <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        "john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
        "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "gorcunov@...il.com" <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC:     "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/39] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW

On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 02:17 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> (flags & PSE|RW|D) == PSE|D;
> 
> R/O+D can exist higher in the paging structures and does not convey
> type=shstk-ness to later stages of the walk.

Hmm, yes. I guess it would be more correct to check if it's a leaf as
well.

> 
> 
> However, there is a further complication which is bound rear its head
> sooner or later, and warrants discussing.
> 
> type=shstk isn't actually only R/O+D on the leaf PTE; its also R/W on
> the accumulated access rights on non-leaf PTEs.
> 
> Specifically, if you clear the RW bit on any higher level in the
> pagetable, then everything mapped by that PTE ceases to be of type
> shstk, even if the leaf has the R/O+D bit combination.
> 
> This is allegedly a feature for the database folks, where they can
> create R/O and R/W aliases of the same memory, sharing intermediate
> pagetables, where the R/W alias will set D bits per usual and the R/O
> alias needs not to transmogrify itself into a shadow stack.

Thanks, I somehow missed this corner of the architecture. It looks like
this is not an issue for Linux at the moment because non-leaf PTEs
should have Write=1. I guess we need to keep this in mind if we ever
have Write=0 upper level PTEs though. Maybe a comment around
_PAGE_TABLE would be useful.