linux-kernel - Re: mainline build failure due to 5d8c3e836fc2 ("drm/amd/display: fix array-bounds error in dc_stream_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whR8T1x6DRnOMJsorajT3A-y9+j5Mpeh0zcUXcJiJWheg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 12:39:40 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@....com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mainline build failure due to 5d8c3e836fc2 ("drm/amd/display: fix
 array-bounds error in dc_stream_remove_writeback()")

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 1:51 AM Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This is only seen with gcc-11, gcc-12 builds are ok.

Hmm. This seems to be some odd gcc issue.

I *think* that what is going on is that the test

        j = 0 ; j < MAX_DWB_PIPES

makes gcc decide that "hey, j is in the range [0,MAX_DWB_PIPES[", and
then since MAX_DWB_PIPES is 1, that simplifies to "j must be zero".
Good range analysis so far.

But for 'i', we start off with that lower bound of 0, but the upper
bound is not fixed (the test for "i" is: "i < stream->num_wb_info").

And then that "if (i != j)", so now gcc decides that it can simplify
that to "if (i != 0)", and then simplifies *that* to "oh, the lower
bound of 'i' in that code is actually 1.

So then it decides that "stream->writeback_info[i]" must be out of bounds.

Of course, the *reality* is that stream->num_wb_info should be <=
MAX_DWB_PIPES, and as such (with the current MAX_DWB_PIPES value of 1)
it's not that 'i' can be 1, it's that the code in question cannot be
reached at all.

What confuses me is that error message ("array subscript [0, 0] is
outside array bounds of 'struct dc_writeback_info[1]') which seems to
be aware that the value is actually 0.

So this seems to be some gcc-11 range analysis bug, but I don't know
what the fix is. I suspect some random code change would magically
just make gcc realize it's ok after all, but since it all depends on
random gcc confusion, I don't know what the random code change would
be.

The fix *MAY* be to just add a '&& i < MAX_DWB_PIPES' to that loop
too, and then gcc will see that both i and j are always 0, and that
the code is unreachable and not warn about it. Hmm? Can you test that?

And the reason gcc-12 builds are ok probably isn't that gcc-12 gets
this right, it's simply that gcc-12 gets so many *opther* things wrong
that we already disabled -Warray-bounds with gcc-12 entirely.

If somebody cannot come up with a fix, I suspect the solution is "gcc
array bounds analysis is terminally buggy" and we just need to disable
it for gcc-11 too.

Kees, any idea? Who else might be interested in fixing a -Warray-bounds issue?

                 Linus