[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221006000314.73240-9-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 00:03:14 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 8/8] KVM: x86: Directly query supported PERF_CAPABILITIES
for WRMSR checks
Use kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap directly instead of bouncing through
kvm_get_msr_feature() when checking the incoming value for writes to
PERF_CAPABILITIES.
Note, kvm_get_msr_feature() is guaranteed to succeed when getting
PERF_CAPABILITIES, i.e. dropping that check is a nop.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9443ddb358e6..3afe5f4b1a40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3568,20 +3568,15 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
return 1;
vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
break;
- case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES: {
- struct kvm_msr_entry msr_ent = {.index = msr, .data = 0};
-
+ case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
return 1;
- if (kvm_get_msr_feature(&msr_ent))
- return 1;
- if (data & ~msr_ent.data)
+ if (data & ~kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap)
return 1;
vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities = data;
kvm_pmu_refresh(vcpu);
return 0;
- }
case MSR_EFER:
return set_efer(vcpu, msr_info);
case MSR_K7_HWCR:
--
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists