linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm for 6.1-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9tyL=J26aHdhSSK0jwYQLHBf8jjTMvJmj1cQheUF=wpd-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2022 07:41:11 +1000
From:   Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.1-rc1

On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 at 06:24, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 at 06:14, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:48 PM Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:28 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you are seeing this which is an issue with GPU TLB flushes which
> > > > is kind of sporadic:
> > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2113
> > >
> > > Well, that seems to be 5.19, and while timing changes (or whatever
> > > other software updates) could have made it start trigger, this machine
> > > has been pretty solid otgerwise.
> > >
> > > > Are you seeing any GPU page faults in your kernel log?
> > >
> > > Nothing even remotely like that "no-retry page fault" in that issue
> > > report. Of course, if it happens just before the whole thing locks
> > > up...
> >
> > Your chip is too old to support retry faults so it's likely you could
> > be just seeing a GPU page fault followed by a hang.  Your chip also
> > lacks a paging queue, so you would be affected by the TLB issue.
>
>
> Okay I got my FIJI running Linus tree and netconsole to blow up like
> this, running fedora 36 desktop, steam, firefox, and then I ran
> poweroff over ssh.
>
> [ 1234.778760] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088
> [ 1234.778782] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 1234.778787] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 1234.778791] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 1234.778798] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [ 1234.778803] CPU: 7 PID: 805 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted 6.0.0+ #2
> [ 1234.778809] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product
> Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 5603 07/28/2020
> [ 1234.778813] RIP: 0010:drm_sched_job_done.isra.0+0xc/0x140 [gpu_sched]
> [ 1234.778828] Code: aa 0f 1d ce e9 57 ff ff ff 48 89 d7 e8 9d 8f 3f
> ce e9 4a ff ff ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 55 53
> 48 89 fb <48> 8b af 88 00 00 00 f0 ff 8d f0 00 00 00 48 8b 85 80 01 00
> 00 f0
> [ 1234.778834] RSP: 0000:ffffabe680380de0 EFLAGS: 00010087
> [ 1234.778839] RAX: ffffffffc04e9230 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000018
> [ 1234.778897] RDX: 00000ba278e8977a RSI: ffff953fb288b460 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [ 1234.778901] RBP: ffff953fb288b598 R08: 00000000000000e0 R09: ffff953fbd98b808
> [ 1234.778905] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffabe680380ff8 R12: ffffabe680380e00
> [ 1234.778908] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00000000ffffffff R15: ffff953fbd9ec458
> [ 1234.778912] FS:  00007f35e7008580(0000) GS:ffff95428ebc0000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 1234.778916] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 1234.778919] CR2: 0000000000000088 CR3: 000000010147c000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
> [ 1234.778924] Call Trace:
> [ 1234.778981]  <IRQ>
> [ 1234.778989]  dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked+0x6a/0xe0
> [ 1234.778999]  dma_fence_signal+0x2c/0x50
> [ 1234.779005]  amdgpu_fence_process+0xc8/0x140 [amdgpu]
> [ 1234.779234]  sdma_v3_0_process_trap_irq+0x70/0x80 [amdgpu]
> [ 1234.779395]  amdgpu_irq_dispatch+0xa9/0x1d0 [amdgpu]
> [ 1234.779609]  amdgpu_ih_process+0x80/0x100 [amdgpu]
> [ 1234.779783]  amdgpu_irq_handler+0x1f/0x60 [amdgpu]
> [ 1234.779940]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x46/0x190
> [ 1234.779946]  handle_irq_event+0x34/0x70
> [ 1234.779949]  handle_edge_irq+0x9f/0x240
> [ 1234.779954]  __common_interrupt+0x66/0x100
> [ 1234.779960]  common_interrupt+0xa0/0xc0
> [ 1234.779965]  </IRQ>
> [ 1234.779968]  <TASK>
> [ 1234.779971]  asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
> [ 1234.779976] RIP: 0010:finish_mkwrite_fault+0x22/0x110
> [ 1234.779981] Code: 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 55 41
> 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 8b 07 f6 40 50 08 0f 84 eb 00 00 00 48 8b 45 30
> 48 8b 18 <48> 89 df e8 66 bd ff ff 48 85 c0 74 0d 48 89 c2 83 e2 01 48
> 83 ea
> [ 1234.779985] RSP: 0000:ffffabe680bcfd78 EFLAGS: 00000202
>
> I'll see if I can dig any.

I'm kicking the tires on the drm-next tree just prior to submission,
and in an attempt to make myself look foolish and to tempt fate, it
seems stable.

This might mean a silent merge conflict/regression, I'll bash on the
drm-next tree a lot more and see if I can play spot the difference.

Dave.