[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202210061616.40497D6C@keescook>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 16:16:47 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, kernel@...ccoli.net, anton@...msg.org,
ccross@...roid.com, tony.luck@...el.com, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] efi: pstore: Follow convention for the efi-pstore
backend name
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:42:11PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> For some reason, the efi-pstore backend name (exposed through the
> pstore infrastructure) is hardcoded as "efi", whereas all the other
> backends follow a kind of convention in using the module name.
>
> Let's do it here as well, to make user's life easier (they might
> use this info for unloading the module backend, for example).
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Looks fine to me. Ard, if you don't object, I can carry this in the
pstore tree.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists