[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221007103008.3ad5913f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 10:30:08 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the broadcom tree
Hi Rafał,
On Thu, 06 Oct 2022 07:14:05 +0200 Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl> wrote:
>
> On 2022-10-06 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Oct 2022 09:21:21 +0200 "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> > wrote:
> >> >> Agreed. Alternatively, we could just remove the pcie@ nodes from
> >> bcm5301x as a hotfix, as they are clearly not usable in the
> >> current form, and none of the three versions (5.19, Rafał's
> >> patch missing ranges, and Florian's patch with incorrect ranges)
> >> actually conform to the binding.
> >> >> I'll tentatively apply the revert for now so I can send the pull
> >> request tonight. If someone comes up with a better fix, I can
> >> use that instead.
> >
> > I applied the revert to the merge of the arm-soc tree today and *all*
> > the warnings are gone.
>
> As explained by Joel, there are dtc and yaml warnings.
>
> Not "*all*" warnings are gone
> dtc warnings are gone
> yaml warnings are back
>
> Which may be OK, just clarifying.
Ah, OK, now I see. The build I do (arm multi_v7_defconfig) does not
produce the yaml warnings (for me anyway - maybe I have not installed
some optional build tool?), so I never saw them - all I saw was all the
new dtc warnings.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists