[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60557988-a5e5-8c81-72f9-c0f3ab9ed573@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 14:45:59 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_mpc52xx: Replace NO_IRQ by 0
On 10/6/22 14:17, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().
>
> On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.
>
> irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.
>
> So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Doesn't this need fixes and cc:stable tags ?
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c b/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c
> index 6559b606736d..3ebd6522a1fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_mpc52xx.c
> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static int mpc52xx_ata_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> udma_mask = ATA_UDMA2 & ((1 << (*prop + 1)) - 1);
>
> ata_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
> - if (ata_irq == NO_IRQ) {
> + if (!ata_irq) {
> dev_err(&op->dev, "error mapping irq\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists