linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: add sdm670 pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:14:05 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Richard Acayan <mailingradian@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: add sdm670 pinctrl

On 06/10/2022 00:23, Richard Acayan wrote:
>> On 04/10/2022 23:58, Richard Acayan wrote:
>>> The Snapdragon 670 has a Top-Level Mode Multiplexer (TLMM) for various
>>> features. Add a driver to support it.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> +
>>> +const int sdm670_reserved_gpios[] = {
>>> +	58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 104, -1
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data sdm670_pinctrl = {
>>> +	.pins = sdm670_pins,
>>> +	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_pins),
>>> +	.functions = sdm670_functions,
>>> +	.nfunctions = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_functions),
>>> +	.groups = sdm670_groups,
>>> +	.ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_groups),
>>> +	.ngpios = 151,
>>> +	.reserved_gpios = sdm670_reserved_gpios,
>>> +	.complement_fw_gpio_ranges = true,
>>
>> This still fails to build... v6 was not compilable, v7 is still.
> 
> Sorry, I only see the problem with complement_fw_gpio_ranges being removed from
> the struct and not being removed here (in v7). Is there another issue that
> affected v6?

Check the reports from kernel build robot.

Best regards,
Krzysztof