linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] libsas and drivers: NCQ error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:37:06 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>
CC:     "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
        "damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        yangxingui <yangxingui@...wei.com>,
        yanaijie <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] libsas and drivers: NCQ error handling

On 05/10/2022 22:28, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Do you know why it fails to read the log?
> Can you read the NCQ Command Error log using ATA16 passthrough commands?
> 
> sudo sg_sat_read_gplog -d --log=0x10 /dev/sdc
> 
> The first byte is the last NCQ tag (in hex) that failed.

Please see other reply.

> 
> 
> I tried your patch, and it looks good:

Thanks, good to know.

> 
> [ 6656.228131] ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x460000 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
> [ 6656.252759] ata5.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> [ 6656.271554] ata5.00: cmd 61/00:00:00:d8:8a/04:00:ce:03:00/40 tag 17 ncq dma 524288 out
>                          res 41/04:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x1 (device error)
> [ 6656.309308] ata5.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
> [ 6656.316403] ata5.00: error: { ABRT }
> [ 6656.322300] ata5.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> [ 6656.330871] ata5.00: cmd 61/00:00:00:dc:8a/04:00:ce:03:00/40 tag 18 ncq dma 524288 out
>                          res 41/04:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x1 (device error)
> [ 6656.356295] ata5.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
> [ 6656.362931] ata5.00: error: { ABRT }
> [ 6656.368897] ata5.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
> [ 6656.377471] ata5.00: cmd 61/00:00:00:d4:8a/04:00:ce:03:00/40 tag 22 ncq dma 524288 out
>                          res 43/04:00:ff:d7:8a/00:00:ce:03:00/40 Emask 0x400 (NCQ error) <F>
> [ 6656.403149] ata5.00: status: { DRDY SENSE ERR }
> [ 6656.410624] ata5.00: error: { ABRT }
> 
> However, since this is a change from the existing behavior of this driver,
> this could go as a separate patch, and does not need to delay this series.
> 
> 

ok, but I am not sure about this series for 6.1 since it's now, so I 
will just wait.

> 
> I also think that we should do a similar patch for sas_ata_task_done():
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> index d35c9296f738..648d0693ceee 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void sas_ata_task_done(struct sas_task *task)
>                          }
>   
>                          dev->sata_dev.fis[3] = 0x04; /* status err */
> -                       dev->sata_dev.fis[2] = ATA_ERR;
> +                       dev->sata_dev.fis[2] = ATA_ERR | ATA_DRDY;
>                  }
>          }
> 
> To avoid all SAS errors from being reported as HSM errors.

Yeah, I tend to agree. I can put that change in another patch.

Thanks,
John