linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86947512-33c8-4e22-5329-a41735c6b1ef@nvidia.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 09:45:17 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mohan Kumar D <mkumard@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ALSA: hda: Rework snd_hdac_stream_reset() to use
 macros


On 05/10/2022 13:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:

...

>> HDA playback is failing on -next for various Tegra boards. Bisect is
>> point to this commit and reverting it fixes the problem. I was a bit
>> puzzled why this change is causing a problem, but looking closer there
>> is a difference between the previous code that was calling
>> snd_hdac_stream_readb() and the new code that is calling
>> snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(). The function snd_hdac_stream_readb()
>> calls snd_hdac_aligned_mmio() is see if the device has an aligned MMIO
>> which Tegra does and then would call snd_hdac_aligned_read(). However,
>> now the code always call readb() and this is breaking Tegra.
>>
>> So it is either necessary to update snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll() to
>> handle this or revert this change.
> 
> Does the patch below work?
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 
> -- 8< --
> --- a/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> +++ b/include/sound/hdaudio.h
> @@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ int snd_hdac_get_stream_stripe_ctl(struct hdac_bus *bus,
>   #define snd_hdac_stream_readb(dev, reg) \
>   	snd_hdac_reg_readb((dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
>   #define snd_hdac_stream_readb_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
> -	readb_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
> -			   delay_us, timeout_us)
> +	read_poll_timeout(snd_hdac_reg_readb, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us,\
> +			  false, (dev)->bus, (dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg)
>   #define snd_hdac_stream_readl_poll(dev, reg, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) \
>   	readl_poll_timeout((dev)->sd_addr + AZX_REG_ ## reg, val, cond, \
>   			   delay_us, timeout_us)


So looking at this a bit more I see ...

[  199.422773] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!
[  199.427610] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G      D  C         6.0.0-rc7-next-20220930-00007-gd6ae4ed0a78f-dirty #23
[  199.438880] Hardware name: NVIDIA Jetson Nano Developer Kit (DT)
[  199.444899] Call trace:
[  199.447357]  dump_backtrace.part.7+0xe8/0xf8
[  199.451680]  show_stack+0x14/0x38
[  199.455024]  dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0x7c
[  199.458715]  dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
[  199.462067]  dequeue_task_idle+0x2c/0x58
[  199.466038]  dequeue_task+0x38/0x98
[  199.469565]  __schedule+0x4a4/0x6d8
[  199.473104]  schedule+0x58/0xc0
[  199.476292]  schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x98/0x108
[  199.481472]  schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18
[  199.486039]  usleep_range_state+0x7c/0xb0
[  199.490084]  snd_hdac_stream_reset+0xe8/0x328 [snd_hda_core]
[  199.495913]  snd_hdac_stream_sync+0xe4/0x190 [snd_hda_core]
[  199.501627]  azx_pcm_trigger+0x1d8/0x250 [snd_hda_codec]
[  199.507109]  snd_pcm_do_stop+0x54/0x70
[  199.510904]  snd_pcm_action_single+0x44/0xa0
[  199.515215]  snd_pcm_drain_done+0x20/0x28
[  199.519267]  snd_pcm_update_state+0x114/0x128
[  199.523670]  snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0+0x22c/0x3a0
[  199.528246]  snd_pcm_period_elapsed_under_stream_lock+0x44/0x88
[  199.534216]  snd_pcm_period_elapsed+0x24/0x48
[  199.538617]  stream_update+0x3c/0x50 [snd_hda_codec]
[  199.543737]  snd_hdac_bus_handle_stream_irq+0xe8/0x150 [snd_hda_core]
[  199.550320]  azx_interrupt+0xb4/0x1b0 [snd_hda_codec]
[  199.555524]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x74/0x140
[  199.560281]  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x14/0x48
[  199.564772]  handle_irq_event+0x44/0x88
[  199.568653]  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa8/0x130
[  199.572788]  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x40
[  199.577452]  gic_handle_irq+0x9c/0xb8
[  199.581168]  call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x40
[  199.585129]  do_interrupt_handler+0x7c/0x80
[  199.589355]  el1_interrupt+0x34/0x68
[  199.592969]  el1h_64_irq_handler+0x14/0x20
[  199.597107]  el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
[  199.600540]  cpuidle_enter_state+0x130/0x2f8
[  199.604853]  cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x50
[  199.608463]  call_cpuidle+0x18/0x38
[  199.611991]  do_idle+0x1f8/0x248
[  199.615259]  cpu_startup_entry+0x20/0x28
[  199.619224]  kernel_init+0x0/0x128
[  199.622669]  arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x8
[  199.627240]  start_kernel+0x630/0x668
[  199.630933]  __primary_switched+0xb4/0xbc


If I change your patch to be read_poll_timeout_atomic, then it works \o/

Can we make that update?

Jon

-- 
nvpublic