[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ded0300b-5b54-48eb-038e-102ae91573c5@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 11:29:33 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9, 2/4] mailbox: mtk-cmdq: add gce software ddr enable
private data
Il 06/10/22 06:34, Yongqiang Niu ha scritto:
> if gce work control by software, we need set software enable
> for MT8186 Soc
>
> there is a handshake flow between gce and ddr hardware,
> if not set ddr enable flag of gce, ddr will fall into idle
> mode, then gce instructions will not process done.
> we need set this flag of gce to tell ddr when gce is idle or busy
> controlled by software flow.
>
> 0x48[2:0] means control by software
> 0x48[18:16] means ddr enable
> 0x48[2:0] is pre-condition of 0x48[18:16].
> if we want set 0x48[18:16] ddr enable, 0x48[2:0] must be set at same
> time.
> and only these bits is useful, other bits is useless bits
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> index c3cb24f51699..04eb44d89119 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>
> #define GCE_GCTL_VALUE 0x48
> #define GCE_CTRL_BY_SW GENMASK(2, 0)
> +#define GCE_DDR_EN GENMASK(18, 16)
>
> #define CMDQ_THR_ACTIVE_SLOT_CYCLES 0x3200
> #define CMDQ_THR_ENABLED 0x1
> @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ struct cmdq {
> bool suspended;
> u8 shift_pa;
> bool control_by_sw;
> + bool sw_ddr_en;
> u32 gce_num;
> };
>
> @@ -88,6 +90,7 @@ struct gce_plat {
> u32 thread_nr;
> u8 shift;
> bool control_by_sw;
> + bool sw_ddr_en;
> u32 gce_num;
> };
>
> @@ -132,6 +135,9 @@ static void cmdq_init(struct cmdq *cmdq)
> if (cmdq->control_by_sw)
> writel(GCE_CTRL_BY_SW, cmdq->base + GCE_GCTL_VALUE);
>
> + if (cmdq->sw_ddr_en)
> + writel(GCE_DDR_EN | GCE_CTRL_BY_SW, cmdq->base + GCE_GCTL_VALUE);
> +
No. That's redundant.
Here's a better way:
u32 gctl_regval = 0;
if (cmdq->control_by_sw)
gctl_regval = GCE_CTRL_BY_SW;
if (cmdq->sw_ddr_en)
gctl_regval |= GCE_DDR_EN;
if (val)
writel(gctl_regval, cmdq->base + GCE_GCTL_VALUE);
Regards,
Angelo
> writel(CMDQ_THR_ACTIVE_SLOT_CYCLES, cmdq->base + CMDQ_THR_SLOT_CYCLES);
> for (i = 0; i <= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT; i++)
> writel(i, cmdq->base + CMDQ_SYNC_TOKEN_UPDATE);
> @@ -545,6 +551,7 @@ static int cmdq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> cmdq->thread_nr = plat_data->thread_nr;
> cmdq->shift_pa = plat_data->shift;
> cmdq->control_by_sw = plat_data->control_by_sw;
> + cmdq->sw_ddr_en = plat_data->sw_ddr_en;
> cmdq->gce_num = plat_data->gce_num;
> cmdq->irq_mask = GENMASK(cmdq->thread_nr - 1, 0);
> err = devm_request_irq(dev, cmdq->irq, cmdq_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists