linux-kernel - [PATCH 02/12] KVM: selftests: Refactor X86_FEATURE_* framework to prep for X86_PROPERTY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221006005125.680782-3-seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Thu,  6 Oct 2022 00:51:15 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: selftests: Refactor X86_FEATURE_* framework to
 prep for X86_PROPERTY_*

Refactor the X86_FEATURE_* framework to prepare for extending the core
logic to support "properties".  The "feature" framework allows querying a
single CPUID bit to detect the presence of a feature; the "property"
framework will extend the idea to allow querying a value, i.e. to get a
value that is a set of contiguous bits in a CPUID leaf.

Opportunistically add static asserts to ensure features are fully defined
at compile time, and to try and catch mistakes in the definition of
features.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h  | 38 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
index bb9c5f34a893..144268e30b22 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
@@ -63,16 +63,21 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature {
 	u8	reg;
 	u8	bit;
 };
-#define	KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE(fn, idx, gpr, __bit)	\
-({							\
-	struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature feature = {		\
-		.function = fn,				\
-		.index = idx,				\
-		.reg = KVM_CPUID_##gpr,			\
-		.bit = __bit,				\
-	};						\
-							\
-	feature;					\
+#define	KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE(fn, idx, gpr, __bit)				\
+({										\
+	struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature feature = {					\
+		.function = fn,							\
+		.index = idx,							\
+		.reg = KVM_CPUID_##gpr,						\
+		.bit = __bit,							\
+	};									\
+										\
+	static_assert((fn & 0xc0000000) == 0 ||					\
+		      (fn & 0xc0000000) == 0x40000000 ||			\
+		      (fn & 0xc0000000) == 0x80000000 ||			\
+		      (fn & 0xc0000000) == 0xc0000000);				\
+	static_assert(idx < BIT(sizeof(feature.index) * BITS_PER_BYTE));	\
+	feature;								\
 })
 
 /*
@@ -426,15 +431,22 @@ static inline void cpuid(uint32_t function,
 	return __cpuid(function, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
 }
 
-static inline bool this_cpu_has(struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature feature)
+static inline uint32_t __this_cpu_has(uint32_t function, uint32_t index,
+				      uint8_t reg, uint8_t lo, uint8_t hi)
 {
 	uint32_t gprs[4];
 
-	__cpuid(feature.function, feature.index,
+	__cpuid(function, index,
 		&gprs[KVM_CPUID_EAX], &gprs[KVM_CPUID_EBX],
 		&gprs[KVM_CPUID_ECX], &gprs[KVM_CPUID_EDX]);
 
-	return gprs[feature.reg] & BIT(feature.bit);
+	return (gprs[reg] & GENMASK(hi, lo)) >> lo;
+}
+
+static inline bool this_cpu_has(struct kvm_x86_cpu_feature feature)
+{
+	return __this_cpu_has(feature.function, feature.index,
+			      feature.reg, feature.bit, feature.bit);
 }
 
 #define SET_XMM(__var, __xmm) \
-- 
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog