[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32ecbd1c-0940-85ee-2ca9-687d80317948@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 11:34:38 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: fsl_pamu: Replace NO_IRQ by 0
On 2022-10-06 06:24, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> NO_IRQ is used to check the return of irq_of_parse_and_map().
>
> On some architecture NO_IRQ is 0, on other architectures it is -1.
>
> irq_of_parse_and_map() returns 0 on error, independent of NO_IRQ.
>
> So use 0 instead of using NO_IRQ.
Crucially, NO_IRQ *is* 0 on PowerPC where this driver actually runs, so
there's no functional issue here. However the justification for cleaning
it up makes perfect sense overall.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
> index 0d03f837a5d4..1b53d2da2c19 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> of_get_address(dev->of_node, 0, &size, NULL);
>
> irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, 0);
> - if (irq == NO_IRQ) {
> + if (!irq) {
> dev_warn(dev, "no interrupts listed in PAMU node\n");
> goto error;
> }
> @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int fsl_pamu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
>
> error:
> - if (irq != NO_IRQ)
> + if (irq)
> free_irq(irq, data);
>
> kfree_sensitive(data);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists