lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:46:29 +0000
From:   "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     workflows@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Planned changes for bugzilla.kernel.org to reduce the "Bugzilla
 blues"



On 10/3/22 14:22, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 09:16:06AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>> The initial conversation started with the fact that Bugzilla is old,
>> semi-deprecated, requires MySQL [no idea what's bad about it, Bugzilla
>> can work with MariaDB and Percona as well]
>
> It can't, actually. It only works with MySQL 5.7 or an equally ancient MariaDB.
> No, there is no official fix (because nobody is working on bugzilla).
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592129
>

(I wanted to send this message two days ago but my email account was
suspended at the time - I'm still sending it though it feels like it's
no longer relevant).

Speaking of Bugzilla Harmony:

* KDE already uses it:
https://invent.kde.org/websites/bugs-kde-org/-/merge_requests/1
* Mozilla has been using it for quite time already
* It has a docker container/image, so it's a breeze to install

I've dealt with a dozen other bug trackers and to me Bugzilla remains
the most powerful and featureful, while not being too complicated to set
up and use.

Lastly I've had a crazy idea for a second of maybe migrating the kernel
bugzilla over to RedHat/IBM (by asking them whether they are willing to
help) but on a second thought it's really really bad as the company is
very large and there's a ton of bureaucracy, so managing it would become
quite a hassle. Also, I wouldn't want the LF to hand control over it to
RedHat.

Best regards,
Artem

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ