| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Yz62XmiH8YG3Dtsf@orome>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 13:05:02 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
smangipudi@...dia.com, kyarlagadda@...dia.com,
Manish Bhardwaj <mbhardwaj@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: tegra186: Check GPIO pin permission before
access.
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:18:45PM +0530, Prathamesh Shete wrote:
> This change checks if we have the necessary permission to
> access the GPIO. For devices that have support for virtualisation
> we need to check both the TEGRA186_GPIO_VM_REG and the
> TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_REG registers. For device that do not have
> virtualisation support for GPIOs we only need to check the
> TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_REG register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Bhardwaj <mbhardwaj@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
This looks mostly good. A few small comments, see below.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
> index 54d9fa7da9c1..34b6c287d608 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,22 @@
>
> #define TEGRA186_GPIO_INT_ROUTE_MAPPING(p, x) (0x14 + (p) * 0x20 + (x) * 4)
>
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_VM 0x00
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_VM_RW_MASK 0x03
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR 0x04
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_PIN_SIZE 0x08
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_PORT_SIZE 0x40
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_WEN BIT(28)
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_REN BIT(27)
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_G1W BIT(9)
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_G1R BIT(1)
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_FULL_ACCESS (TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_WEN | \
> + TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_REN | \
> + TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_G1R | \
> + TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_G1W)
> +#define TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_ENABLE (TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_WEN | \
> + TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_REN)
> +
> /* control registers */
> #define TEGRA186_GPIO_ENABLE_CONFIG 0x00
> #define TEGRA186_GPIO_ENABLE_CONFIG_ENABLE BIT(0)
> @@ -77,6 +93,7 @@ struct tegra_gpio_soc {
> unsigned int num_irqs_per_bank;
>
> const struct tegra186_pin_range *pin_ranges;
> + bool has_vm_support;
You've placed this right between two fields that clearly belong
together. Best to add new fields towards the end of the structure if
they are not related to any of the other fields.
> unsigned int num_pin_ranges;
> const char *pinmux;
> bool has_gte;
> @@ -129,6 +146,58 @@ static void __iomem *tegra186_gpio_get_base(struct tegra_gpio *gpio,
> return gpio->base + offset + pin * 0x20;
> }
>
> +static void __iomem *tegra186_gpio_get_secure_base(struct tegra_gpio *gpio,
> + unsigned int pin)
> +{
> + const struct tegra_gpio_port *port;
> + unsigned int offset;
> +
> + port = tegra186_gpio_get_port(gpio, &pin);
> + if (!port)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + offset = port->bank * 0x1000 + port->port * TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_PORT_SIZE;
> +
> + return gpio->secure + offset + pin * TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_PIN_SIZE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool tegra186_gpio_is_accessible(struct tegra_gpio *gpio, u32 pin)
Pin offsets are "unsigned int" in the rest of the driver, so please
stick to that here as well.
> +{
> + void __iomem *secure;
> + u32 val;
The drivers uses "u32 value;" everywhere else, so best stick to that for
consistency.
> +
> + secure = tegra186_gpio_get_secure_base(gpio, pin);
> +
> + if (gpio->soc->has_vm_support) {
> + val = readl(secure + TEGRA186_GPIO_VM);
> + if ((val & TEGRA186_GPIO_VM_RW_MASK) != TEGRA186_GPIO_VM_RW_MASK)
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + val = __raw_readl(secure + TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR);
> +
> + if ((val & TEGRA186_GPIO_SCR_SEC_ENABLE) == 0)
> + return true;
> +
> + if ((val & TEGRA186_GPIO_FULL_ACCESS) == TEGRA186_GPIO_FULL_ACCESS)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra186_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> + unsigned long *valid_mask, unsigned int ngpios)
> +{
> + struct tegra_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + int j;
Make that unsigned int to match the type of ngpios.
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < ngpios; j++) {
> + if (!tegra186_gpio_is_accessible(gpio, j))
> + clear_bit(j, valid_mask);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tegra186_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> unsigned int offset)
> {
> @@ -763,6 +832,7 @@ static int tegra186_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> gpio->soc = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> gpio->gpio.label = gpio->soc->name;
> gpio->gpio.parent = &pdev->dev;
> + gpio->gpio.init_valid_mask = tegra186_init_valid_mask;
Maybe slot this in before the gpio->gpio.add_pin_ranges assignment
further below in this function to keep things ordered a bit better.
>
> /* count the number of banks in the controller */
> for (i = 0; i < gpio->soc->num_ports; i++)
> @@ -1042,6 +1112,7 @@ static const struct tegra_gpio_soc tegra194_main_soc = {
> .num_pin_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_main_pin_ranges),
> .pin_ranges = tegra194_main_pin_ranges,
> .pinmux = "nvidia,tegra194-pinmux",
> + .has_vm_support = true,
> };
>
> #define TEGRA194_AON_GPIO_PORT(_name, _bank, _port, _pins) \
> @@ -1067,6 +1138,7 @@ static const struct tegra_gpio_soc tegra194_aon_soc = {
> .instance = 1,
> .num_irqs_per_bank = 8,
> .has_gte = true,
> + .has_vm_support = false,
> };
>
> #define TEGRA234_MAIN_GPIO_PORT(_name, _bank, _port, _pins) \
> @@ -1111,6 +1183,7 @@ static const struct tegra_gpio_soc tegra234_main_soc = {
> .name = "tegra234-gpio",
> .instance = 0,
> .num_irqs_per_bank = 8,
> + .has_vm_support = true,
> };
>
> #define TEGRA234_AON_GPIO_PORT(_name, _bank, _port, _pins) \
> @@ -1136,6 +1209,7 @@ static const struct tegra_gpio_soc tegra234_aon_soc = {
> .name = "tegra234-gpio-aon",
> .instance = 1,
> .num_irqs_per_bank = 8,
> + .has_vm_support = false,
It's not technically necessary to initialize 0/false fields because
that's what they end up with if you don't initialize them at all. I do
like to be explicit, so no objection from me on this. However, since we
are being explicit, we should set this new field for Tegra186 and
Tegra241 as well.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists