[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yz65kF01XYLayp9E@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:18:40 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] perf test: Introduce script for data symbol testing
Em Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:10:39PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> This commit introduces a shell script for data symbol testing.
>
> The testing is designed a data structure with 64-byte alignment, it has
> two fields "data1" and "data2", and other fields are reserved.
>
> Using "perf mem" command, we can record and report memory samples for a
> self-contained workload with 1 second duration. If have no any memory
> sample for the data structure "buf1", it reports failure; and by
> checking the offset in structure "buf1", if any memory accessing is not
> for "data1" and "data2" fields, it means wrong data symbol parsing and
> returns failure.
Replaced the one I had merged with v5 and added this:
Committer testing:
[root@...co ~]# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz
[root@...co ~]#
[root@...co ~]# perf test -v "data symbol"
104: Test data symbol :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 192318
Compiling test program...
Recording workload...
[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.389 MB /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.LIuQl (5570 samples) ]
Cleaning up files...
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
Test data symbol: Ok
[root@...co ~]#
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
-------------
The verbose mode could show the 'perf report' output, I think, but this
can be done later, if agreed.
Thanks, applied!
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes from v4:
> - Remove the redundant argument "--" before CPU list (Namhyung).
> This patch is dependent on the fixing:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221004200211.1444521-1-namhyung@kernel.org/
>
> Changes from v3:
> - Add specific testing chunk for AMD CPUs (Ravi).
>
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_data_symbol.sh | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_data_symbol.sh
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_data_symbol.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_data_symbol.sh
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..cd6eb54d235d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_data_symbol.sh
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# Test data symbol
> +
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, 2022
> +
> +skip_if_no_mem_event() {
> + perf mem record -e list 2>&1 | egrep -q 'available' && return 0
> + return 2
> +}
> +
> +skip_if_no_mem_event || exit 2
> +
> +# skip if there's no compiler
> +if ! [ -x "$(command -v cc)" ]; then
> + echo "skip: no compiler, install gcc"
> + exit 2
> +fi
> +
> +TEST_PROGRAM=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.program.XXXXX)
> +PERF_DATA=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
> +
> +check_result() {
> + # The memory report format is as below:
> + # 99.92% ... [.] buf1+0x38
> + result=$(perf mem report -i ${PERF_DATA} -s symbol_daddr -q 2>&1 |
> + awk '/buf1/ { print $4 }')
> +
> + # Testing is failed if has no any sample for "buf1"
> + [ -z "$result" ] && return 1
> +
> + while IFS= read -r line; do
> + # The "data1" and "data2" fields in structure "buf1" have
> + # offset "0x0" and "0x38", returns failure if detect any
> + # other offset value.
> + if [ "$line" != "buf1+0x0" ] && [ "$line" != "buf1+0x38" ]; then
> + return 1
> + fi
> + done <<< "$result"
> +
> + return 0
> +}
> +
> +cleanup_files()
> +{
> + echo "Cleaning up files..."
> + rm -f ${PERF_DATA}
> + rm -f ${TEST_PROGRAM}
> +}
> +
> +trap cleanup_files exit term int
> +
> +# compile test program
> +echo "Compiling test program..."
> +cat << EOF | cc -o ${TEST_PROGRAM} -x c -
> +typedef struct _buf {
> + char data1;
> + char reserved[55];
> + char data2;
> +} buf __attribute__((aligned(64)));
> +
> +static buf buf1;
> +
> +int main(void) {
> + for (;;) {
> + buf1.data1++;
> + buf1.data2 += buf1.data1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EOF
> +
> +echo "Recording workload..."
> +
> +# perf mem/c2c internally uses IBS PMU on AMD CPU which doesn't support
> +# user/kernel filtering and per-process monitoring, spin program on
> +# specific CPU and test in per-CPU mode.
> +is_amd=$(egrep -c 'vendor_id.*AuthenticAMD' /proc/cpuinfo)
> +if (($is_amd >= 1)); then
> + perf mem record -o ${PERF_DATA} -C 0 -- taskset -c 0 $TEST_PROGRAM &
> +else
> + perf mem record --all-user -o ${PERF_DATA} -- $TEST_PROGRAM &
> +fi
> +
> +PERFPID=$!
> +
> +sleep 1
> +
> +kill $PERFPID
> +wait $PERFPID
> +
> +check_result
> +exit $?
> --
> 2.34.1
--
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists