[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <89d873fc-9f0a-156e-dcf2-48a2b9f93dcc@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 15:01:14 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, joro@...tes.org
Cc: will@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@....com,
vasant.hegde@....com, mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com,
schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu: Move bus setup to IOMMU device
registration
Hi Robin,
On 15/08/2022 17:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Move the bus setup to iommu_device_register(). This should allow
> bus_iommu_probe() to be correctly replayed for multiple IOMMU instances,
> and leaves bus_set_iommu() as a glorified no-op to be cleaned up next.
>
> At this point we can also handle cleanup better than just rolling back
> the most-recently-touched bus upon failure - which may release devices
> owned by other already-registered instances, and still leave devices on
> other buses with dangling pointers to the failed instance. Now it's easy
> to clean up the exact footprint of a given instance, no more, no less.
Since this change, I have noticed that the DRM driver on Tegra20 is
failing to probe and I am seeing ...
tegra-gr2d 54140000.gr2d: failed to attach to domain: -19
drm drm: failed to initialize 54140000.gr2d: -19
Bisect points to this change and reverting it fixes it. Let me know if
you have any thoughts.
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists