linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add KX022A maintainer entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08ccdc318b448eb69c82efc82adcd044536df4af.1665066397.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:38:34 +0300
From:   Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>,
        Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
        Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add KX022A maintainer entry

Add maintainer entry for ROHM/Kionix KX022A accelerometer senor driver.

Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>

---
I can also add myself as a maintainer instead of a reviewer if it better
suits iio maintainer. I however don't plan setting up my own public
repository and hope the further patches will be merged via IIO tree.

So, as Geert once explained to me - In that case the difference between
me as a maintainer vs. a reviewer would be only really relevant to the
subsystem (in this case IIO) maintainer. The subsystem maintainer who
merges patches is allowed to take in changes acked by downstream
maintainer w/o obligation to do thorough review. (Downstream maintainer is
to be blamed if things explode :]). If ack is given by a reviewer, then
the subsystem maintainer has the full responsibility and should always
do the review. Or - this is how I remember our discussion went - feel
free to correct me if I am wrong :] In any case - please let me know if
you'd rather see M: not R: in front of my name for the kx022a.
---
 MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index f5ca4aefd184..641b4fc2e5e2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -11356,6 +11356,11 @@ F:	drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c
 F:	include/linux/mfd/khadas-mcu.h
 F:	drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c
 
+KIONIX/ROHM KX022A ACCELEROMETER
+R:	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
+S:	Supported
+F:	drivers/iio/accel/kionix-kx022a*
+
 KMEMLEAK
 M:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
 S:	Maintained
-- 
2.37.3


-- 
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =] 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)