[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221006000314.73240-2-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 00:03:07 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] perf/x86/core: Zero @lbr instead of returning -1 in
x86_perf_get_lbr() stub
Drop the return value from x86_perf_get_lbr() and have the stub zero out
the @lbr structure instead of returning -1 to indicate "no LBR support".
KVM doesn't actually check the return value, and instead subtly relies on
zeroing the number of LBRs in intel_pmu_init().
Formalize "nr=0 means unsupported" so that KVM doesn't need to add a
pointless check on the return value to fix KVM's benign bug.
Note, the stub is necessary even though KVM x86 selects PERF_EVENTS and
the caller exists only when CONFIG_KVM_INTEL=y. Despite the name,
KVM_INTEL doesn't strictly require CPU_SUP_INTEL, it can be built with
any of INTEL || CENTAUR || ZHAOXIN CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 6 +-----
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 47fca6a7a8bc..3abf7b041220 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1876,10 +1876,8 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
* x86_perf_get_lbr - get the LBR records information
*
* @lbr: the caller's memory to store the LBR records information
- *
- * Returns: 0 indicates the LBR info has been successfully obtained
*/
-int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
+void x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
{
int lbr_fmt = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format;
@@ -1887,8 +1885,6 @@ int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
-
- return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_perf_get_lbr);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index f6fc8dd51ef4..18c105571d11 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -542,12 +542,12 @@ static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)
extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
-extern int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
+extern void x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
#else
struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
-static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
+static inline void x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
{
- return -1;
+ memset(lbr, 0, sizeof(*lbr));
}
#endif
--
2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists