[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXPwJsCX3DsCn78aW_3S237sOxKzT3z3zs4W+1eq31JzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 11:57:31 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf tools: Remove special handling of system-wide evsel
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 1:46 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> For system-wide evsels, the thread map should be dummy - i.e. it has a
> single entry of -1. But the code guarantees such a thread map, so no
> need to handle it specially.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/lib/perf/evsel.c | 3 ---
> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 3 ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 12 ++----------
> tools/perf/util/stat.c | 3 ---
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> index 8ce5bbd09666..8b51b008a81f 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/evsel.c
> @@ -515,9 +515,6 @@ int perf_evsel__alloc_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads)
> if (ncpus == 0 || nthreads == 0)
> return 0;
>
> - if (evsel->system_wide)
> - nthreads = 1;
> -
> evsel->sample_id = xyarray__new(ncpus, nthreads, sizeof(struct perf_sample_id));
> if (evsel->sample_id == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> index 886f53cfa257..7fa467ed91dc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> @@ -2243,9 +2243,6 @@ static void __process_stat(struct evsel *counter, u64 tstamp)
> struct perf_cpu cpu;
> static int header_printed;
>
> - if (counter->core.system_wide)
> - nthreads = 1;
> -
> if (!header_printed) {
> printf("%3s %8s %15s %15s %15s %15s %s\n",
> "CPU", "THREAD", "VAL", "ENA", "RUN", "TIME", "EVENT");
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 5776bfa70f11..e319bb17d10d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static struct perf_thread_map *empty_thread_map;
> static int __evsel__prepare_open(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> struct perf_thread_map *threads)
> {
> - int nthreads;
> + int nthreads = perf_thread_map__nr(threads);
A general nit for something not introduced by this change. nr/nthreads
here is really the number of perf_event_open file descriptors needed
for the thread map. I wonder if a variable name of num_thread_fds
would make the code more intention revealing.
Thanks,
Ian
>
> if ((perf_missing_features.write_backward && evsel->core.attr.write_backward) ||
> (perf_missing_features.aux_output && evsel->core.attr.aux_output))
> @@ -1839,11 +1839,6 @@ static int __evsel__prepare_open(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> threads = empty_thread_map;
> }
>
> - if (evsel->core.system_wide)
> - nthreads = 1;
> - else
> - nthreads = threads->nr;
> -
> if (evsel->core.fd == NULL &&
> perf_evsel__alloc_fd(&evsel->core, perf_cpu_map__nr(cpus), nthreads) < 0)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2061,10 +2056,7 @@ static int evsel__open_cpu(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_cpu_map *cpus,
> if (threads == NULL)
> threads = empty_thread_map;
>
> - if (evsel->core.system_wide)
> - nthreads = 1;
> - else
> - nthreads = threads->nr;
> + nthreads = perf_thread_map__nr(threads);
>
> if (evsel->cgrp)
> pid = evsel->cgrp->fd;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> index ce5e9e372fc4..cef943377ad7 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> @@ -420,9 +420,6 @@ static int process_counter_maps(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> int ncpus = evsel__nr_cpus(counter);
> int idx, thread;
>
> - if (counter->core.system_wide)
> - nthreads = 1;
> -
> for (thread = 0; thread < nthreads; thread++) {
> for (idx = 0; idx < ncpus; idx++) {
> if (process_counter_values(config, counter, idx, thread,
> --
> 2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists