lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2022 09:29:23 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@...neltoast.com>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] random: spread out jitter callback to different CPUs

On 2022-10-06 09:39:46 [-0700], Sultan Alsawaf wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Sultan,

> But since a timer is marked as not-pending prior to when it runs, add_timer_on()
> can't detect if the timer is actively running; the above BUG_ON() won't be
> tripped. So the UaF scenario I forsee is that doing this:
>     add_timer_on(timer, 0);
>     // timer is actively running on CPU0, timer is no longer pending
>     add_timer_on(timer, 1); // changes timer base, won't wait for timer to stop
>     del_timer_sync(timer); // only checks CPU1 timer base for the running timer

/me taking notes.

> Sultan

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ