[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAYoRsXgmwQXNzDPgVe=_cW=C8_7__GYHCyRKkfX=6dFY9dybw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:06:58 -0700
From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@....com>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, lukasz.luba@....com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com, yu.chen.surf@...il.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] cpuidle: teo: Introduce optional util-awareness
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 7:49 AM Kajetan Puchalski
<kajetan.puchalski@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, all the available idle governors operate mainly based on their own past performance
> without taking into account any scheduling information.
...
I tried V2 on my Intel i5-10600K, but there was little difference when
compared to V1 in terms of enormous increase in processor power
consumption for the periodic type tests I ran. However, sometimes the
power use would drop down to comparable to the normal teo or menu
governors for a short time, which V1 didn't do.
I would suggest a completely new governor for your
only 2 idle states, and of similar power use, scenario.
Incredibly simple:
If CPU utilization >= threshold
select idle state 0
Else
Select idle state 1
Endif
As previously mentioned, you are overriding
everything that teo does anyhow.
Note to other readers: I also sent Kajetan an off-list email with more
tests descriptions and web links to results graphs and such.
... Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists