[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPm50aK9oe-m5QWfrFjzGx_vvNveA+U6-Fs3KD5+Zq5RZ+UhDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 23:58:53 +0800
From: Hao Peng <flyingpenghao@...il.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH ] kvm: x86: Reduce unnecessary function call
From: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
kvm->lock is held very close to mutex_is_locked(kvm->lock).
Do not need to call mutex_is_locked.
Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <flyingpeng@...cent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 02f9e4f245bd..8a7dbe2c469a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -601,8 +601,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_pmu_event_filter(struct kvm
*kvm, void __user *argp)
sort(&filter->events, filter->nevents, sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64, NULL);
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
- filter = rcu_replace_pointer(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, filter,
- mutex_is_locked(&kvm->lock));
+ filter = rcu_replace_pointer(kvm->arch.pmu_event_filter, filter, 1);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
synchronize_srcu_expedited(&kvm->srcu);
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists