[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR1101MB21611798953AADA4DFD71719A85F9@BN6PR1101MB2161.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 18:01:06 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/6] x86/gsseg: use the LKGS instruction if available for
load_gs_index()
> > + alternative_io("1: call asm_load_gs_index\n"
> > + ".pushsection \".fixup\",\"ax\"\n"
> > + "2: xorl %k[sel], %k[sel]\n"
> > + " jmp 1b\n"
> > + ".popsection\n"
> > + _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b),
> > + _ASM_BYTES(0x3e) LKGS_DI,
> > + X86_FEATURE_LKGS,
> > + ASM_OUTPUT2([sel] "+D" (sel), ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT),
> > + ASM_NO_INPUT_CLOBBER(_ASM_AX));
> > }
>
> I'm very sure none of this was tested... the .fixup section hasn't existed for
> almost a year now.
Weird, did you ever check a kernel dump?
>
> e5eefda5aa51 ("x86: Remove .fixup section")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists