[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F4064514-E927-4FBD-BE49-AA83E8453ACA@zytor.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 00:16:22 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/6] x86/gsseg: use the LKGS instruction if available for load_gs_index()
On October 7, 2022 10:32:31 PM PDT, "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com> wrote:
>> > Andrew Cooper suggested upgrading the orphan section warning to a hard
>> > link error, orphan sections are bad regardless.
>> >
>>
>> Agreed 1000%. This is a no-brainer. From IRC:
>>
>>
>> <andyhhp> -LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --orphan-handling=warn <andyhhp>
>> +LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --orphan-handling=error
>
>Who is going to make the change?
>
Why don't you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists