lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 9 Oct 2022 12:53:40 +0200
From:   Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
To:     Rui Li <me@...ui.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192e: Fix braces/tabs/number/OOM warnings

On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 12:46:44PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 11:55:36AM +0800, Rui Li wrote:
> > Fix warnings generated by checkpatch.pl: unnecessary braces after
> > if, too many leading tabs, int type conversion before number,
> > OOM message ourput.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rui Li <me@...ui.org>
> > ---
> >  .../staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c    |  3 +-
> >  .../staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c    |  9 ++----
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c  |  3 --
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c    | 30 +++++++------------
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c     |  5 ++--
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c     |  1 +
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c          |  8 ++---
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_softmac_wx.c  |  7 ++---
> >  8 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
> > index 18e4e5d84878..8d20b0deca37 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
> > @@ -1112,9 +1112,8 @@ void  rtl92e_fill_tx_desc(struct net_device *dev, struct tx_desc *pdesc,
> >  	if (cb_desc->bHwSec) {
> >  		static u8 tmp;
> >  
> > -		if (!tmp) {
> > +		if (!tmp)
> >  			tmp = 1;
> > -		}
> >  		switch (priv->rtllib->pairwise_key_type) {
> >  		case KEY_TYPE_WEP40:
> >  		case KEY_TYPE_WEP104:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
> > index 1b592258e640..4e3d183be0f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
> > @@ -522,9 +522,8 @@ static bool _rtl92e_bb_config_para_file(struct net_device *dev)
> >  		rtStatus  = rtl92e_check_bb_and_rf(dev,
> >  						   (enum hw90_block)eCheckItem,
> >  						   (enum rf90_radio_path)0);
> > -		if (!rtStatus) {
> > +		if (!rtStatus)
> >  			return rtStatus;
> > -		}
> >  	}
> >  	rtl92e_set_bb_reg(dev, rFPGA0_RFMOD, bCCKEn|bOFDMEn, 0x0);
> >  	_rtl92e_phy_config_bb(dev, BaseBand_Config_PHY_REG);
> > @@ -1379,9 +1378,8 @@ static bool _rtl92e_set_rf_power_state(struct net_device *dev,
> >  					i++;
> >  				}
> >  
> > -				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x) {
> > +				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x)
> >  					break;
> > -				}
> >  			}
> >  			rtl92e_set_rf_off(dev);
> >  			break;
> > @@ -1398,9 +1396,8 @@ static bool _rtl92e_set_rf_power_state(struct net_device *dev,
> >  					i++;
> >  				}
> >  
> > -				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x) {
> > +				if (i >= MAX_DOZE_WAITING_TIMES_9x)
> >  					break;
> > -				}
> >  			}
> >  
> >  			if (pPSC->RegRfPsLevel & RT_RF_OFF_LEVL_HALT_NIC &&
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
> > index 89bc989cffba..b2facb273474 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
> > @@ -908,9 +908,6 @@ static void _rtl92e_init_priv_variable(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	priv->card_type = PCI;
> >  
> >  	priv->pFirmware = vzalloc(sizeof(struct rt_firmware));
> > -	if (!priv->pFirmware)
> > -		netdev_err(dev,
> > -			   "rtl8192e: Unable to allocate space for firmware\n");
> >  
> >  	skb_queue_head_init(&priv->skb_queue);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> > index 702551056227..32494ad2298b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c
> > @@ -267,9 +267,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_check_ac_dc_power(struct net_device *dev)
> >  			"PATH=/usr/bin:/bin",
> >  			 NULL};
> >  
> > -	if (priv->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_SILENT) {
> > +	if (priv->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_SILENT)
> >  		return;
> > -	}
> >  
> >  	if (priv->rtllib->state != RTLLIB_LINKED)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -330,9 +329,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_check_rate_adaptive(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	bool bshort_gi_enabled = false;
> >  	static u8 ping_rssi_state;
> >  
> > -	if (!priv->up) {
> > +	if (!priv->up)
> >  		return;
> > -	}
> >  
> >  	if (pra->rate_adaptive_disabled)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -777,9 +775,8 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_tx_power_tracking_cb_thermal(struct net_device *dev)
> >  		tmpRegA = rtl92e_get_bb_reg(dev, rOFDM0_XATxIQImbalance,
> >  					    bMaskDWord);
> >  		for (i = 0; i < OFDM_Table_Length; i++) {
> > -			if (tmpRegA == OFDMSwingTable[i]) {
> > +			if (tmpRegA == OFDMSwingTable[i])
> >  				priv->OFDM_index[0] = i;
> > -			}
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		TempCCk = rtl92e_get_bb_reg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter1, bMaskByte2);
> > @@ -1066,9 +1063,8 @@ void rtl92e_dm_restore_state(struct net_device *dev)
> >  	u32	reg_ratr = priv->rate_adaptive.last_ratr;
> >  	u32 ratr_value;
> >  
> > -	if (!priv->up) {
> > +	if (!priv->up)
> >  		return;
> > -	}
> >  
> >  	if (priv->rate_adaptive.rate_adaptive_disabled)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -1877,20 +1873,16 @@ static void _rtl92e_dm_rx_path_sel_byrssi(struct net_device *dev)
> >  						tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
> >  						cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i;
> >  					} else if (cur_cck_pwdb ==
> > -						   tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) {
> > -						if (tmp_cck_sec_pwdb ==
> > -						    tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> > -							tmp_cck_sec_pwdb =
> > -								 cur_cck_pwdb;
> > -							cck_rx_ver2_sec_index =
> > -								 i;
> > -						}
> > +							tmp_cck_sec_pwdb &&
> > +							tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> > +						tmp_cck_sec_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
> > +						cck_rx_ver2_sec_index = i;
> 
> This is not functionally equivalent. Are you sure the entire if else
> chain still behaves correctly?
> 
> >  					} else if ((cur_cck_pwdb < tmp_cck_sec_pwdb) &&
> >  						   (cur_cck_pwdb > tmp_cck_min_pwdb)) {
> >  						;
> > -					} else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> > -						if (tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb)
> > -							tmp_cck_min_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
> > +					} else if (cur_cck_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb &&
> > +						tmp_cck_sec_pwdb == tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> > +						tmp_cck_min_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
> 
> Same story as above.
> 
> >  					} else if (cur_cck_pwdb < tmp_cck_min_pwdb) {
> >  						tmp_cck_min_pwdb = cur_cck_pwdb;
> >  					}
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
> > index 19d13b3fcecf..e932ad1a9e96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c
> > @@ -180,11 +180,10 @@ static void rtllib_send_ADDBAReq(struct rtllib_device *ieee, u8 *dst,
> >  
> >  	skb = rtllib_ADDBA(ieee, dst, pBA, 0, ACT_ADDBAREQ);
> >  
> > -	if (skb) {
> > +	if (skb)
> >  		softmac_mgmt_xmit(skb, ieee);
> > -	} else {
> > +	else
> >  		netdev_dbg(ieee->dev, "Failed to generate ADDBAReq packet.\n");
> > -	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void rtllib_send_ADDBARsp(struct rtllib_device *ieee, u8 *dst,
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > index ef3dca51cf99..b763cf0ba356 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ static u8 LINKSYS_MARVELL_4400N[3] = {0x00, 0x14, 0xa4};
> >  void HTUpdateDefaultSetting(struct rtllib_device *ieee)
> >  {
> >  	struct rt_hi_throughput *pHTInfo = ieee->pHTInfo;
> > +
> >  	pHTInfo->bRegShortGI20MHz = 1;
> >  	pHTInfo->bRegShortGI40MHz = 1;
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c
> > index 46d75e925ee9..ca7eba826ece 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_rx.c
> > @@ -454,14 +454,14 @@ static bool AddReorderEntry(struct rx_ts_record *pTS,
> >  	while (pList->next != &pTS->rx_pending_pkt_list) {
> >  		if (SN_LESS(pReorderEntry->SeqNum, ((struct rx_reorder_entry *)
> >  		    list_entry(pList->next, struct rx_reorder_entry,
> > -		    List))->SeqNum))
> > +		    List))->SeqNum)) {
> >  			pList = pList->next;
> > -		else if (SN_EQUAL(pReorderEntry->SeqNum,
> > +			continue;
> > +		} else if (SN_EQUAL(pReorderEntry->SeqNum,
> >  			((struct rx_reorder_entry *)list_entry(pList->next,
> >  			struct rx_reorder_entry, List))->SeqNum))
> >  			return false;
> > -		else
> > -			break;
> > +		break;
> >  	}
> >  	pReorderEntry->List.next = pList->next;
> >  	pReorderEntry->List.next->prev = &pReorderEntry->List;
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_softmac_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_softmac_wx.c
> > index f9589c5b62ba..4fc4fb25d8d6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_softmac_wx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_softmac_wx.c
> > @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ int rtllib_wx_set_freq(struct rtllib_device *ieee, struct iw_request_info *a,
> >  
> >  	/* if setting by freq convert to channel */
> >  	if (fwrq->e == 1) {
> > -		if ((fwrq->m >= (int)2.412e8 &&
> > -		     fwrq->m <= (int)2.487e8)) {
> > +		if ((fwrq->m >= 2.412e8 &&
> > +		     fwrq->m <= 2.487e8)) {
> 
> This turns integer conversions into floating point conversions. I don't
> this floating point operations are allowed in the kernel.

Sorry I was a bit sleepy writing this. I meant "This turns integer comparisons
into floating point comparisons. I don't think floating point operations are
allowed in the kernel."

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ