linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add KX022A maintainer entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:38:36 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>,
        Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
        Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add KX022A maintainer entry

On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 17:38:34 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> Add maintainer entry for ROHM/Kionix KX022A accelerometer senor driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> I can also add myself as a maintainer instead of a reviewer if it better
> suits iio maintainer. I however don't plan setting up my own public
> repository and hope the further patches will be merged via IIO tree.
> 
> So, as Geert once explained to me - In that case the difference between
> me as a maintainer vs. a reviewer would be only really relevant to the
> subsystem (in this case IIO) maintainer. The subsystem maintainer who
> merges patches is allowed to take in changes acked by downstream
> maintainer w/o obligation to do thorough review. (Downstream maintainer is
> to be blamed if things explode :]). If ack is given by a reviewer, then
> the subsystem maintainer has the full responsibility and should always
> do the review. Or - this is how I remember our discussion went - feel
> free to correct me if I am wrong :] In any case - please let me know if
> you'd rather see M: not R: in front of my name for the kx022a.


Entirely up to you.  I tend to take a look at all IIO patches but will
take a less detailed look if there is a tag from someone I've built
up trust with - doesn't matter if they are a maintainer of a particular
driver or not. I only ever look at MAINTAINERS when sending out patches,
never when reviewing except to perhaps moan that someone wasn't cc'd
who should have been!

Jonathan


> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index f5ca4aefd184..641b4fc2e5e2 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -11356,6 +11356,11 @@ F:	drivers/mfd/khadas-mcu.c
>  F:	include/linux/mfd/khadas-mcu.h
>  F:	drivers/thermal/khadas_mcu_fan.c
>  
> +KIONIX/ROHM KX022A ACCELEROMETER
> +R:	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
> +S:	Supported
> +F:	drivers/iio/accel/kionix-kx022a*
> +
>  KMEMLEAK
>  M:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>  S:	Maintained